Human Population Control
This page will explain both lethal and non lethal way to solve this problem.
WARNING: Some content on this page might be extremely offensive toward humanitarian especially the one who donate to the poor and pro-life'ers. I'm a pro-choice and pro advocate for human population control.
Related source: (HERE) and (HERE)
Human population control is the practice of artificially altering the rate of growth of a human population.

Historically, human population control has been implemented by limiting the population's birth rate, usually by government mandate, and has been undertaken as a response to factors including high or increasing levels of poverty, environmental concerns, religious reasons, and overpopulation. While population control can involve measures that improve people's lives by giving them greater control of their reproduction, some programs have exposed them to exploitation.

Worldwide, the population control movement was active throughout the 1960s and 1970s, driving many reproductive health and family planning programs. In the 1980s, tension grew between population control advocates and women's health activists who advanced women's reproductive rights as part of a human rights-based approach. Growing opposition to the narrow population control focus led to a significant change in population control policies in the early 1990s. (Source)


Population control may use one or more of the following practices although there are other methods as well:

  • contraception
  • abstinence
  • medical abortion
  • emigration
  • decreasing immigration
  • sterilization
  • euthanasia

The method(s) chosen can be strongly influenced by the religious and cultural beliefs of community members. The failure of other methods of population control can lead to the use of abortion or infanticide as solutions. While a specific population control practice may be legal/mandated in one country, it may be illegal or restricted in another, indicative of the controversy surrounding this topic.

Opposition to population control
The Roman Catholic Church has opposed abortion, sterilization, and contraception as a general practice, but specifically in regard to population control policies.[citation needed] Pope Benedict XVI has stated that "The extermination of millions of unborn children, in the name of the fight against poverty, actually constitutes the destruction of the poorest of all human beings".

I am soo sick of those pedophile based cult "Catholics" being human huggers and not issuing about human overpopulation which will cause more deaths, poverty and famine. They oppose birth control, they even oppose condoms. What??? So they can rape more children those asshole pedophile Catholics priests. I severely condemn this Christian terms cult called Catholicism because they are financial exploiters, pedophiles and government funded. Christianity is no better. Obsession on humans leads to endangerment of other species and overpopulation, majorities of human huggers are anthropocentric and don't give a shit about other species and they say nothing about human overpopulation.

Population control is also increasingly being featured in many environmental documentaries and films. An example is The Planet -documentary, which describes the ongoing rising human population , its effects on the planet, and the necessity of population control .

As early as 1798, Thomas Malthus stated in his Essay on the Principle of Population that population control needed to be implemented into society. Around the year 1900, Sir Francis Galton said in his publication called " Hereditary Improvement " that, "The unfit could become enemies to the State, if they continue to propagate." In 1968, Paul Ehrlich noted in The Population Bomb that, "We must cut the cancer of population growth," and that, "if this was not done, there would be only one other solution, namely the ‘death rate solution' in which we raise the death rate through war-famine-pestilence etc.”

In the same year, another prominent modern advocate for mandatory population control was Garrett Hardin , who proposed in his landmark 1968 essay The Tragedy of the Commons that society must relinquish the "freedom to breed" through "mutual coercion, mutually agreed upon." Later on, in 1972, he reaffirmed his support in his new essay “ Exploring New Ethics for Survival ”, by stating that, “We are breeding ourselves into oblivion.” Other people advocating population control in the past were: Bertrand Russell , Margaret Sanger (1939), John D. Rockefeller , Frederick Osborn (1952), Isaac Asimov , Jacques Cousteau , ...

Today, a number of influential people advocate population control . They are:

  • Me,
  • David Attenborough,
  • Michael E. Arth,
  • Jonathon Porritt , UK sustainable development commissioner,
  • Sara Parkin,
  • VHEMT ( Voluntary Human Extinction Movement.),
  • Eric R. Pianka,
  • Crispin Tickell,
Those are people with more conscious and cares about the world's future. Yes we are breeding ourselves to oblivion. Many people are dumb and hypocrite, they will ignore this serious problem and take the blame on wildlife population. Wildlife population are
"over populated" because of us, habitat shrinking makes them look overpopulation. our kind should be responsible our own actions and issuing on our numbers before dictating on other species population. Majorities of people blaming wildlife population and saying NOTHING about human overpopulation are selfish, anthropocentric, speciesism and idiots. They don't give a crap about wildlife nor our own kind. People not issuing about human overpopulation means they don't care about wildlife's future nor our future period.
Few graphs about the world overpopulating and more.

For more check its (Source)

Ways To Control Human Population

Ways to control human population

The numbers of humans on Earth have increased enormously during the past several millennia, but especially during the past two centuries. By the end of the twentieth century, the global population of humans was 6.0 billion. That figure is twice the population of 1960, a mere 30 years earlier. Moreover, the human population is growing at about 1.5% annually, equivalent to an additional 89 million people per year. The United Nations Population Fund estimates that there will likely be about nine billion people alive in the year 2050.

In addition, the numbers of animals that live in a domestic mutualism with humans have also risen. These companion species must be supported by the biosphere along with their human patrons, and can be considered an important component of the environmental impact of the human enterprise. The large domestic animals include about 1.7 billion sheep and goats, 1.3 billion cows, and 0.3 billion horses, camels, and water buffalo. Humans are also accompanied by a huge population of smaller animals, including 10-11 billion chickens and other fowl.

The biological history of Homo sapiens extends more than one million years. For almost all of that history, a relatively small population was engaged in a subsistence lifestyle, involving the hunting of wild animals and the gathering of edible plants. The global population during those times was about a million people. However, the discoveries of crude tools, weapons, and hunting and gathering techniques allowed prehistoric humans to become increasingly more effective in exploiting their environment, which allowed increases in population to occur. About ten thousand years ago, people discovered primitive agriculture through the domestication of a few plant and animal species, and ways of cultivating them to achieve greater yields of food. (Source)

Non lethal ways to control human overpopulation.

Every non-lethal ways to control human overpopulation will be listed below with brief details on them.

  • contraception or birth control - Birth control is an effective way to prevent accidental fertilization while having sex with a partner of the opposite sex. Birth control is an umbrella term for several techniques and methods use to prevent fertilization or to interrupt pregnancy at various stages.
  • abstinence -Sexual abstinence is the practice of refraining from some or all aspects of sexual activity for medical, psychological, legal, social or religious reasons.
  • medical abortion or simply known as abortion - Abortion is the termination of a pregnancy by the removal or expulsion of a fetus or embryo from the uterus , resulting in or caused by its death. Abortion its an humane and effective tool to terminate unwanted pregnancies / fetus. Fetus has no rights and cannot decide, they don't feel pain... Yet because they don't have consciousness nor awareness. Also what makes right-wings or pro-life hypocrite is how come they are in favor for the death penalty but oppose abortion?. Human overpopulation can lead to crueler deaths such as starvation, famine, diseases and making the 1st world and 2nd world countries sick. Also pro-wildlife user / exploiters are hypocrite, they preach wildlife disease and diseases threatening human health also preach overpopulation of wildlife causes starvation and diseases. What about human overpopulation? It causes incurrable diseases such as AIDS etc, starvation and diseases. Cause of wildlife over population is by killing off the predator and shrinking their habitats which makes them look more populated. Also back to topic, abortion is an effective non-lethal human management tool.
    Abortion is not considered lethal way because the fetus has no consciousness nor awareness, it cannot fear the incoming death, cannot react to pain yet so is considered non-lethal way. Lethal way means killing someone born or child and or adult because they feel pain, react to fear and more.
    nervous reflexes doesn't count. I talk about reacting to incoming pain (fear, defensive state), screaming, crying, anger and shock etc. Also right wings are hypocrite they are pro-wars which it forces someone to join the army or jail. Wars causes many deaths the inhumane way it is more painful than abortion because the person suffers, extreme fear, stress PTSD and a lot more.
  • emigration - Emigration is the act of leaving one's native country or region to settle in another. It is the same as immigration but from the perspective of the country of origin. Human movement before the establishment of political boundaries or within one state, is termed migration.
  • decreasing immigration - Immigration reduction refers to a movement in the United States that advocates a reduction in the amount of immigration allowed into the country. This can include a reduction in the numbers of legal immigrants , advocating stronger action be taken to prevent illegal entry and illegal immigration , and reductions in non-immigrant temporary work visas (such as H-1B and L-1 ). What separates it from others who want immigration reform is that reductionists see immigration- or one of its forms- as being a significant source of social, economic, and environmental problems, and wish to cut current immigration levels.
  • sterilization - Sterilization (also spelled sterilisation ) is a surgical technique leaving a male or female unable to reproduce . It is a method of birth control . For non-surgical causes of sterility. That is something poor people will need, well not permanent but like those thing they surgically put something on the vasa deferentia called vasectomy I think. Not permanent sterilization but temporaly such clamping the vasa deferentia so the sperm doesn't reach the prostate. This can be a good idea and humane way to prevent poor starving people from breeding like rats and having 4-10 children causing them to die of a horrible death such as starvation, spreading diseases etc. Also can be an effective tool to prevent the poor to overbreed and threaten the ecosystem, exceeding habitat capacity and threaten wildlife from human overpopulation. If they get rich, have a future and able to have a good life and raising healthy kids they remove those clamps w/e and can reproduce again.
  • one-child policy - The one-child policy (policy of birth planning ) refers to the one-child limitation on most families in the population control policy of the People's Republic of China (PRC). The Chinese government refers to it under the official translation of family planning policy. But we need to make this measure more aggressive like a global one-child policy which would be the most humane and
    non-kill also effective way to slowly cull overpopulation, only exceptions allowed if you get twins, triplets etc which is rare and is not the woman's fault if they have twins etc. Also banning underage pregnancies which causes the underage person to lose his youth privilege such as the fun stuff young people do, premature responsability and limited money.
  • Banning divorces - Banning divorces except if the person's mate is abusive. Divorce are a factor in overpopulation in my theory because when someone let say has 1-4 kids from that man and they split with the new man if the person is still young they will have more kids then they ditch their new husband and find another one and have kids again. That is a cause of overpopulation, some may even abandon or alienize their original kids which I find it totally disgusting like having kids and then they avoid their original kids because they have new kids, some people does that. Or disallowing to have kids with the new husband or wife because of the uncertain future of Earth cause by overpopulation crisis. Many wont realize that our chance to find an Earth-like planet is like soo slim that is considered ZERO. We cannot colonize Mars because it has less gravity than Earth and our bone density will fail and your body will breakdown. Venus is out of the question because its more massive than Earth and is soo hot that it can melt lead. We have one planet and we can't barely take care of it. Solution is NOT colonizing other planets, is learning responsabilities such as controlling our own population and learning to share our planet with other species (wildlife) that lived BEFORE us on Earth. If we can't take care of Earth and we colonize other planets we will do the same mistake over, over and over again.
I'm not trying to sound like some dictator or someone violating human rights but we are abusing it by overpopulating and making other lifeforms on this planet becoming endangered or go extinct and also abusing other people by reducing their quality of life by overpopulating this planet and making everyone suffer from pollution, food shortages, famine, spreading diseases and more negative effects. I'm probably more human rights than many people even if I am not a human rights person. I am more of a all-life rights and pro environmentalist. Overpopulation is making everyone SUFFER including our future generations. If we ruin Earth and bring all life extinct then is not worth it to live or continue existing because life would simply suck ass if is dominated by humans ONLY. People who think they are helping others and not issuing about human overpopulation and its consequences awaiting just don't care about humans, they are mind-centered selfish goons.
Lethal ways to control human overpopulation.

Every lethal ways to control human overpopulation will be listed below with brief details on them.

  • wars - War is a behavior pattern of organized violent conflict , typified by extreme aggression , societal disruption, and high mortality . This behavior pattern is found in many primate species including man , and also found in many ant species It involves two or more organized groups.
  • diseases - Diseases such as AIDS, ebola, cancer, heart attack, diabetes related deaths and more, which are more non-humane deaths or ways to die.
  • capital punishment or simply known as death penalty - Capital punishment , the death penalty , or execution is the killing of a person by judicial process as a punishment for an offense. Crimes that can result in a death penalty are known as capital crimes or capital offences . The term capital originates from Latin capitalis , literally "regarding the head" (Latin caput ). Hence, a capital crime was originally one punished by the severing of the head. I am in favor of the death penalty to execute scum of the Earth like murderers, serial rapists, criminal against humanity etc. Why feed those losers when the food can be use for good cause instead of bad cause. It cost an average of 50K a year I think to feed lifesentence prisoners, security watch, their food, medical and more.
  • euthanasia - Euthanasia good death": e?, eu (well or good) refers to the practice of ending a life in a manner which relieves pain and suffering. According to the House of Lords Select Committee on Medical Ethics , the precise definition of euthanasia is "a deliberate intervention undertaken with the express intention of ending a life, to relieve intractable suffering.
One way or the other we will be obligated to use the lethal way to cull human overpopulation. I am ethic and realistic here so I am saying one way or the other we will be obligated to use lethal ways to cull our numbers which overpopulation is threatening our survival, quality of life, Earth resources, forests, animals, water, air and a lot more. But it should not be the inhumane ways like wars, diseases etc. Many starving family are excess population "nuissance humans" that are destroying the environment, threatening the other species survival, famine, poverty, spreading diseases and more. Those are the people that probably will be need to be euthanize when the time comes that we become obligated to cull human or we all go extinct, I'd rather having them euthanizing surplus than dying out. If we do not take actions Earth resources will be EXHAUSTED and we will become all poor. Many human hugging idiots will refuse to believe that because they don't care about our survival and other species survival because they will be dead by the time it happens, they don't care if their future generations suffers the deadly consequeces of famine, drought, non drinkable water, unbreathable air, diseases, poverty, severe food shortage and more.
Earth is NOT infinite and we have exceeded the carrying limit of this planet, if there are poor people is because they are SURPLUS, people who preach wildlife population and saying they will suffer starvation, diseases and death but saying nothing about human population are assholes, selfish hicks and centered-minded ignorant fools, they lack in awareness and seriousness. One days when it comes and we become too overpopulation there will be human extinction or human culling. Culling would be euthanize all the starving, faminely ridden poors, street bums, criminals sentence to life in prison with NO chance of parole, serial rapists, poachers, every one working in tobacco companies and more. We don't need those assholes working in tobaccos because they are murderers in my views, just like mafia style or organized criminals, they don't kill someone directly but they use a product to kill someone. Is like let say Jack makes a trapbomb in a mail package but Jeff send it to the victim. If caught the 2 would would face life in prison, so why tobaccos workers doesn't get life sentence for poisoning people with addictive tobaccos products which are WORST than heroin and cocaine, that is pure hypocrisy and corruption. Maybe drug dealers deal drugs to trying to feed their families!!! common thats pure bull. If we cull all the starving poor, famine ridden people, life sentenced criminals, rapists, murderers and etc our numbers would reach the acceptable and sustainable levels so everyone can have equal food, equal quality of life, faster medical instead of waiting months and they die in waiting room and more. Also allowing euthanasia to terminally ill people who wishes to die to end their suffering, the sick they make sure they take final decision with it. Some countries allows human euthanisia when the person is terminally ill and have zero chance to recover. Also euthanasia to PVS ( Persistent vegetative state ) people, they run brain scan and when the middle of the brain is all black (fluid) it means it's gone and they will NEVER recover or wakeup fully consciouss and aware etc. One brain is damage like that or gone it will NEVER heal or regenerate. Brain does heal a little bit but at this condition it doesn't. People saying to the person who woke up but respond to stimulus, reflexes are too emotionally attached to that person. Those PVS people with zero chance to heal, recover and gain consciousness able to understand, and talk again are a waste our limited resources. I know it sounds harsh but one way or the other that time will come, I tell you.
But comatose people with their brain intact (not shrunken or turned into fluid), they will have a chance to wake up. Some can wake up in a few minutes to several years even decades. So those are the chance to be able to talk and slowly remembering stuff again.

Top scientist Eric Pianka's idea and my opinion on his idea (below)


Top Scientist Advocates Mass Culling 90% Of Human Population
Fellow professors and scientists applause and roar approval at elite's twisted and genocidal population control agenda

Paul Joseph Watson & Alex Jones/Prison | April 3 2006

A top scientist gave a speech to the Texas Academy of Science last month in which he advocated the need to exterminate 90% of the population through the airborne ebola virus. Dr. Eric R. Pianka's chilling comments, and their enthusiastic reception again underscore the elite's agenda to enact horrifying measures of population control.

Pianka's speech was ordered to be kept off the record before it began as cameras were turned away and hundreds of students, scientists and professors sat in attendance.

Saying the public was not ready to hear the information presented, Pianka began by exclaiming, “We're no better than bacteria!”, as he jumped into a doomsday malthusian rant about overpopulation destroying the earth.

Standing in front of a slide of human skulls, Pianka gleefully advocated airborne ebola as his preferred method of exterminating the necessary 90% of humans, choosing it over AIDS because of its faster kill period. Ebola victims suffer the most tortuous deaths imaginable as the virus kills by liquefying the internal organs. The body literally dissolves as the victim writhes in pain bleeding from every orifice.

Pianka then cited the Peak Oil fraud as another reason to initiate global genocide. “And the fossil fuels are running out,” he said, “so I think we may have to cut back to two billion, which would be about one-third as many people.”

Later, the scientist welcomed the potential devastation of bird flu and spoke glowingly of China's enforced one child policy, before zestfully commenting, “We need to sterilize everybody on the Earth.”

At the end of Pianka's speech the audience erupted not to a chorus of boos and hisses but to a raucous reception of applause and cheers as audience members clammered to get close to the scientist to ask him follow up questions. Pianka was later presented with a distinguished scientist award by the Academy. Pianka is no crackpot. He has given lectures to prestigious universities worldwide.

One horrified observer was able to make notes on the speech and our gratitude goes to Forrest M. Mims for bringing this sickening display to the attention of the world.

Throughout history elites have invented justification for barbaric practices as a cover for their true agenda of absolute power and control over populations. Up until the 19th century, the transatlantic slave trade was justified by saying that the practice was biblical and therefore morally redeemable in nature, despite the fact that no such bible passage exists.

From 1932 until 1972, the Tuskegee Study Group (pictured below) deliberately infected poor black communities in Alabama with syphilis without their consent and withheld treatment as the diseased rampaged through the town killing families.

In 1951 the Israeli government used US government provided technology to irradiate 100,000 Jewish children in a mass atomic experiment with an entire generation of Sephardi youths used as guinea pigs. 6,000 died immediately after the experiments and the rest suffered for the rest of their lives with debilitating illnesses and cancer.

Pianka's doomsday warning of the population bomb, for which Mims claims he presented no evidence whatsoever, is complete pseudo-science. Populations in developed countries are declining and only in third world countries is it expanding dramatically. Industrialization itself levels out population trends and even despite this world population models routinely show that the earth's population will level out at 9 billion in 2050 and slowly decline after that. "The population of the most developed countries will remain virtually unchanged at 1.2 billion until 2050," states a United Nations report . Conservation International's own study revealed that 46% of the earth's surface was an untouched wilderness, that is land areas not including sea. It is commonly accepted that the entire world population could all fit into the state of Texas and each have an acre of their own land.

Think about the magnitude of Pianka's statements. He wants to kill nine out of every ten members of your family and he wants to kill them in one of the most painful and agonizing ways imaginable.

If Pianka, or 'The Lizard Man' as he likes to be called, is so vehement in the necessity of culling the human population will he step forward to be the first one in line? Will he sacrifice his children for the so-called greater good of the planet? We somehow doubt it.

Will the students who so enthusiastically greeted his ideas go home and kill themselves for the cause if it is so righteous?

It was noted how Pianka presented his argument with the kind of glee that you would see in a demented serial killer before dispatching his victim. This is an attitude we have encountered again and again. To discuss killing 90% of the world's population via a horrific plague is sick enough within itself but you would at least expect its advocates to be serious and sober in their approach to the subject. The opposite seems to be the case, where the subject is aired in a context of lighthearted lip-smacking and hand-rubbing as if the individual was about to sink his teeth into a T-bone steak.

This window gives us a clear view of exactly why these deranged bastards encompass this ideology. They love death and their lives are motivated by dark influences very different to you or I.

Pianka's approval of how the Chinese police state effectively controlled their population tells us that this rhetoric is just the glue that holds together the true agenda of the elite. A staged bio-attack blamed on terrorists could be the perfect cover for enacting the program of population reduction and the usurpation of our remaining freedoms.

In the 21st century the elite are concerned that from over 6 billion people might spring a new elite to challenge their stranglehold on the reigns of power. This is one reason for desire to cull the population down to a manageable level. Another is control over the behavior of the existing serfs and herding them like cattle into the slaughter house.

As we have documented, members of the elite are quite open in their feverish lust to commit mass murder and ethnic cleansing. In the foreword to his biography If I Were An Animal, Prince Philip wrote, "In the event that I am reincarnated, I would like to return as a deadly virus, in order to contribute something to solve overpopulation."

National Security Memo 200, dated April 24, 1974, and titled "Implications of world wide population growth for U.S. security & overseas interests," says:

"Dr. Henry Kissinger proposed in his memorandum to the NSC that "depopulation should be the highest priority of U.S. foreign policy towards the Third World." He quoted reasons of national security, and because `(t)he U.S. economy will require large and increasing amounts of minerals from abroad, especially from less-developed countries ... Wherever a lessening of population can increase the prospects for such stability, population policy becomes relevant to resources, supplies and to the economic interests of U.S."

Kissinger prepared a depopulation manifesto for President Jimmy Carter called 'Global 2000' which detailed using food as a weapon to depopulate the third world.

One of the most chilling admissions of deadly intent came from the lips of the late Jacques Cousteau, the sainted environmental icon. In an interview with the UNESCO Courier for November 1991 the famed oceanographer said:

"The damage people cause to the planet is a function of demographics — it is equal to the degree of development. One American burdens the earth much more than twenty Bangaladeshes. The damage is directly linked to consumption. Our society is turning toward more and needless consumption. It is a vicious circle that I compare to cancer...."

"This is a terrible thing to say. In order to stabilize world population, we must eliminate 350,000 people per day. It is a horrible thing to say, but it's just as bad not to say it."

The Melbourne Age reported on recently uncovered documents detailing Nobel Peace Prize winning microbiologist Sir Macfarlane Burnet's plan to help the Australian government develop biological weapons for use against Indonesia and other "overpopulated" countries of South-East Asia.

Pianka's ideology is in the same league as Hitler, Pol Pot, and the rest of history's despots who advocated mass extermination and had the temerity to dress it up in a 'noble' Straussian facade. We demand that he be investigated for openly calling for mass murder and in the meantime we encourage everyone to click here and e mail Pianka, enabling him to receive your feedback about his wish that you and your entire family die.

His plan is kinda harsh, he has a point but Ebola is inhumane and causes a painful death.
It liquify your internal organs, causing massive hemorrhage, Ebola is very unpredictable and is worst than AIDS, there is no cure and even prorbably no treatment. It has a mortality rate of as much as about 90%. It is extremely contagious, if ebola would be airborn too it would be the worst disease in existence as we known of. Would wipe all life on the surface of this planet. Here is his quote of why he wanna cull as much as 90% of the world's population, 90% is kinda a little too much in my opinion.

"I have two grandchildren and I want them to inherit a stable Earth. But I fear for them. Humans have overpopulated the Earth and in the process have created an ideal nutritional substrate on which bacteria and viruses (microbes) will grow and prosper. We are behaving like bacteria growing on an agar plate, flourishing until natural limits are reached or until another microbe colonizes and takes over, using them as their resource. In addition to our extremely high population density, we are social and mobile, exactly the conditions that favor growth and spread of pathogenic (disease-causing) microbes. I believe it is only a matter of time until microbes once again assert control over our population, since we are unwilling to control it ourselves. This idea has been espoused by ecologists for at least four decades and is nothing new. People just don't want to hear it... I do not bear any ill will toward humanity. However, I am convinced that the world WOULD clearly be much better off without so many of us... We need to make a transition to a sustainable world. If we don't, nature is going to do it for us in ways of her own choosing. By definition, these ways will not be ours and they won't be much fun. Think about that."

Also because we lack in "a predator" we are abusing our dominance and destroying the only world we can live on as we known of. Stable population for this planet is 2 - 2.3 to 2.5 billions worldwide max. We are far more invasive species than any animals on this planet, majorities of humans are soo mislead and hypocrite, I talk the one crying about invasive species in the animal kingdom but they say nothing about us, doing the same and destroying all the forests, endangering many species and more. Invasive species needs to be controlled including us. We're not made to be in every countries in the world. Countries that are poor or severely poor are not made for human to live on them, they are considered inhabitable for human. Is like if you bring an animal in a different country they will starve to death or freeze to death or overheat and or prey on different animals and invade that country because their predator is/are not there. Look at the Easter island example, it used to have forest on it and human colonized it and overpopulated that tiny island and genocided thenselves. Now is a grass-land with little to no trees left on it. Only facial statues and etc. This is an example of what will happen to use in long terms if we don't get a serious population control. We are not alone on this planet we must think of all the animals, trees, insects and etc on this planet. They have the right to exist and prosper. They play a role too in maintaining a stable ecobalance. All the bad stuff on this planet ever occured I mean the unnatural ones was by us.
More radical ideas to control human population. Ideas from random people.
This doesn't reflect of me. Is just an idea, I'm not radical at that level but feargal.... has a point. But man has done soo much bad things to Earth so punishment is the solution for our greed. Very radical punishment because a species existence is the most precious thing ever.
Some extreme ways to conserve our ONLY planet for future generations and saving species from extiction due to overpopulation is going radical.
Mass exterminating poor people (surplus).
Mass exterminating poachers or using poachers for human experimentation (waste of space).
Mass exterminating murderers or using murderers for human experimentation (threat to society).
Mass exterminating rapists or using rapists for human experimentation (threat to victim's mental health).
Mass exterminating criminal against humanity or using them for human experimentation (threat to society)
Mass exterminating sport hunters, trappers (useless to society and can promote poaching).
Mass exterminating all Christian terrorism such as army of god etc (Terrorists).
Mass exterminating all Al-Qaeda members or use all the members for human experimentation (terrorists).
Mass exterminating Every other people with negative value to good people and animals (animal abusers).

Only preserving people contributing to the world such as, politicians, scientists, actors, musicians, artists, engineers, astronaut, rich people, animal right activists, environmentalists, astronomers and others and also people caring for all life (extreme ways such as putting life of a rare species above human values).
I talk about good people, if is a tyrant, a corrupted rich person or any evil abuser of powers, kill him off.
Seriously the time will come if we keep growing and it will be a choice, cull our numbers radically or extinct.